Austin Petersen

What is the Next Big Thing in Libertarianism?

The 2016 Presidential election brought about high interest in the Libertarian movement with Trump and Clinton having such high negative numbers. Many people came to the party in hopes of finding a candidate they could get behind. There were enough people across this country that couldn’t understand the idea of having Trump or Clinton as President.

From BuzzFeed:

Rand Paul was going to build from his father’s following, take the movement mainstream, and win the Republican presidential nomination. He would realign the party establishment around anti-interventionist, fiscally conservative, and (some) socially liberal policies. That didn’t work.

Then the Libertarian Party was going to capitalize on the historic unpopularity of Hillary Clinton and, especially, Donald Trump. Their nominees would run up the middle — if not to the White House, then certainly to official minor party status and the possibility of federal matching funds for future candidates. But their nominees were Gary Johnson and Bill Weld, and that didn’t work, either.

So now libertarians are, at best, back to where they were four years ago. Paul is talking about recapturing the magic of his 2013 filibuster. Johnson and Weld are just a phone call away (not that either should be waiting by the phone this time). President Trump turned out to be more of a foreign policy hawk than he let on, and he is pushing a law-and-order agenda that conflicts with the open-border, pro-criminal justice reform principles of libertarianism. Is his presidency an opportunity, or is it the snuffing out of an opportunity

Something needs to happen in order to get the Libertarian movement back on track. There is a constant debate among American Libertarians on where that fight should happen. Should it be the Libertarian Party or should it be a take over of the Republican Party. Both of these options have been tried and both have failed. So what next?

There are rays of hope out there among candidates seeking positions, but who has the power to capture the hearts of all Americans?

To me there are two options. Rand Paul and Austin Petersen.

Both Republican, one an office holder and one seeking a position. If Austin Petersen were to win his U.S. Senate seat in Missouri and join forces with Rand Paul in the United States Senate, there would be an unstoppable Libertarian wall that would challenge the President and bring light to the idea of living free. Petersen has a fight on his hands in Missouri, but nothing is impossible.

Libertarians need something. Since Trump has taken office the love affair with Liberty has taken a back seat to the ugly rhetoric of Trump and the authoritarian governing that he has partaken in. We need that last hope of light!

Categories: Austin Petersen

Tagged as: , ,

1 reply »

  1. I don’t think voters are comfortable getting behind a libertarian candidate. The fact is conservatives are unnerved by decriminalization of drugs, while the socialist side of democrats are uneasy with a official who would probably be against state sponsored anything, including healthcare. The heart of libertarian belief is to be free to live as you would, and die in the same manner with as little government foot print as possible. I personally am proud to say I voted libertarian, even though I disagree with unregulated drugs,(mj should not be considered a harmful drug) and support healthcare reform in favor of a healthy America. The thing about libertarian candidates is they are probably more relatable to, and more likely to bend to the will of the people.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s